Legal Opinion

Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 18, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-2010-JWLPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. 51). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, plaintiff seeks an order to compel defendant to supplement answers to Interrogatories 6, 8, 9, 12, and 13 of his First Interrogatories to the Defendant and produce documents responsive to Requests 6, 7, 8,14, and 15 of his First Request for Production of Documents & Things to Defendant. He also seeks reasonable costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in preparing the motion. Defendant opposes the motion.

Plaintiff claims that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  2. Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Richardson v. Northwest Central Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  2. St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  3. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  4. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API