Legal Opinion

United States v. Cameron

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 28, 2009No. CR-09-24-B-WPublished

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED 1 ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, TO SHOW CAUSE, AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

The Court denies the Defendant’s motion for relief based on claims of vindictive or selective prosecution.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On February 11, 2009, a federal grand jury issued a sixteen count indictment against James M. Cameron, alleging violations of federal criminal statutes against the possession, transportation, and receipt of child pornography. Indictment (Docket #3). On May 18, 2009, Mr. Cameron moved for discovery, to show cause, and for remedies for vindictive and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Ortiz-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API