Legal Opinion

HERMES INTERNATIONAL and HERMES OF PARIS, INC. v. "MASON ROTHSCHILD" a/k/a SONNY ESTIVAL

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 5, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00384Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HERMÈS INTERNATIONAL and HERMÈS OF PARIS, INC., 22-cv-384 (JSR) Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER -against- MARTIN ROTHSCHILD, Defendant. JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Few presumptions are as integral to judicial efficiency in the federal courts as the one against granting interlocutory review. Time and again, federal courts have recognized that the “result of permitting interim appeals is vexatious and duplicative litigation, prolonged uncertainty, and endless delay.” Picard v. Katz,

466 B.R. 208, 208

(S.D.N.Y. 2012); see Westwood…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Kelly-Brown v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API