Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1990No. 84-702, 88-670 and 89-78PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

Appellant Melvin Doe appeals his conviction for voluntary manslaughter while armed (D.C.Code §§ 22-2405, -3202 (1989 Repl.)) contending that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on causation, and that statements made in the prosecutor’s closing argument to the effect that appellant was a “bad person” improperly prejudiced appellant. Appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction has been consolidated with his appeals from the trial court’s denials, without hearing, of his two post-trial motions under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1989 Repl.). Finding no…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hanna v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Garmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API