Legal Opinion
Bobka v. Mann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 22, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants appeal, as *498limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated August 8, 2002, as denied their motion to compel the plaintiff Florence Bobka to submit to a urodynamic study, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 3, 2002, which denied their motion for leave to reargue.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 3, 2002, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated August…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lapera v. ShafronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Marino v. PenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Santero v. KotwalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- D'Adamo v. Saint Dominic's HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Tidwell v. VillamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rosario v. BNS Buildings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ditroia v. Buck-HaskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.