Hubbard v. State

Barnes, Judge.

Senaca Hubbard appeals his conviction for affray,1 contending his conviction must be reversed because the other combatant was acquitted. Because Hubbard was tried separately and found guilty by a different jury, we reject this argument and affirm.

On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Williams v. State, 217 Ga.…