Legal Opinion

In re Hanley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2014No. 49S00-1410-DI-616Published

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE

Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline” stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below:

Stipulated Facts: In 2006, Respondent hired an attorney (“Associate”) to work in his law office pursuant to an employment agreement. Respondent’s law practice focuses primarily on Social Security disability law.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of: Karl N. TrumanIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API