Anna Tappe, Inc. v. Battelle
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
It is well settled that alimony cannot be subjected to the claims of creditors when such claims antedate the allowance thereof. (Romaine v. Chauncey, 129 N. Y. 566.) As to *50judgment creditor’s claims arising after the allowance, particularly those for necessaries, the law appears to be that alimony is subject thereto. (Stevenson v. Stevenson, 34 Hun, 157; West v. Washburn, 153 App. Div. 460; Fickel v. Granger, 83 Ohio St. 101; Schouler Marr., Div., Sep. & Dom. Pel. [6th ed.] § 1754.) Therefore, assuming that the money due to the wife from the husband herein should be deemed to have the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- West v. WashburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Balanoff v. NiosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Glasser v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. LehmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Zander v. BrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935