Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Santoro

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 1964No. 18265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court refusing a motion by the plaintiff for a change of venue from Richland County to Darlington County, upon the ground that “the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.” Section 10-310 (3), 1962 Code of Laws.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, a resident of Darlington County, against the defendants, residents of Richland County, to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage sustained by the plaintiff as a result of a collision between an automobile driven by the plaintiff and a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Harper v. Newark InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. McMillan v. B. L. Montague Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Basha v. Waccamaw Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Gulledge v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Dimery v. BloomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Oswald v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Cleland v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API