Legal Opinion

Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 9, 2004No. A04A0662PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute between a homebuilder, Linda Martin Homes Corporation, and a dissatisfied customer, Mart Tiismann, following the grant of summary judgment to Linda Martin Homes on Tiismann’s claim for violations of the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act. Finding no error, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Dover v. Mathis, 249 Ga. App. 753 (549 SE2d 541) (2001). On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, a de novo standard of review applies,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Limoli v. First Georgia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Bahadori v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Dover v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. McClung Surveying, Inc. v. WorlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Jennings v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API