Legal Opinion

Schenectady Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P. J.

On December 5, 1988, it was reported that $10,000 was missing from the files of the Vice and Intelligence Unit of respondent’s police department. Upon learning that respondent intended to require two police officers to submit to *850polygraph examinations,* petitioner filed an improper practice charge with the State Public Employment Relations Board (hereinafter PERB), alleging that respondent’s intent to unilaterally impose polygraph testing was violative of Civil Service Law § 209-a (1) (e) as an improper practice.

Before this charge was heard, petitioner initiated the instant CPLR article 78…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n of Greater New York v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API