Legal Opinion

Boradori v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1927No. Docket No. 6009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by appellant against respondent, by whom he was employed for a number of years, to obtain a decree directing the payment of such sum as might be found to be owing to him. As stated by appellant in his opening brief, the case involves two principal questions. The first is whether or not appellant is entitled to share in the profits accruing from subletting certain premises in which respondent’s grocery business had been located; the second whether or not appellant is entitled to a reasonable compensation for services rendered by him following the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hawley v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Amsden v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Amsden v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Axell v. AxellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Smith v. Peninsula House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Sweeney v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API