Legal Opinion
Metallograph Corp. v. Arma Engineering Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 20, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
It appears that the defendant had some government contract by which it was to furnish certain aeronautical instruments. A part of those instruments consisted of certain rings which were to be cut in a certain way and which were to have certain scales thereupon. The defendant made a contract with the plaintiff for the furnishing of these rings, providing for the furnishing of 200 sets absolutely and 4,800 sets thereafter contingently. It seems that in order to make these rings it was necessary to make tools and dies, and, therefore, it was provided that for the first 200 for which an…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Strychalski v. MekusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Frank Associates, Inc. v. John J. Ryan & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Company, Inc., and Lily M. Foregger. Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Company, Inc., and Lily M. ForeggerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Associated Food Stores, Inc. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Rogers-Pyatt Shellac Co. v. Starr Piano Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.