State v. Stueck
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Erdmann
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the implied consent law, § 61-8-402, MCA, apples to a negligent vehicular assault prosecution. The majority’s opinion allows the implied con*48sent law to be used as a shield by defendants in alcohol or drug-related accidents and allows them to prevent the introduction of otherwise admissible evidence of chemical impairment. Further, although not reached by the majority, I would conclude that a warrantless search was appropriate under these circumstances and that the seizure of blood did not violate Greg Stueck’s right of privacy. I…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.