Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stueck

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1996No. 96-081Published

1DissentJustice Erdmann

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the implied consent law, § 61-8-402, MCA, apples to a negligent vehicular assault prosecution. The majority’s opinion allows the implied con*48sent law to be used as a shield by defendants in alcohol or drug-related accidents and allows them to prevent the introduction of otherwise admissible evidence of chemical impairment. Further, although not reached by the majority, I would conclude that a warrantless search was appropriate under these circumstances and that the seizure of blood did not violate Greg Stueck’s right of privacy. I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API