Legal Opinion

Commerce Union Bank v. Albert

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chíbe- Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.,, The :executors- and trustees under the will of Sydney Albert,; deceased, by petition to the Judge of the County Court seek to recover the sum of $3,429.12 from Mrs. Peggy Albert,'’who is the widow' of Sydney Albert, deceased. The"sum of money, claimed to be due and owing, is her contribution to the Federal Estate Tax and Tennessee Inheritance Tax upon property which came into her hands as the widow of Sydney-Albert.

The case is before this Court on a stipulation of facts, as.follows: The-rCommerce Union Bank and Louis. Albert are the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Cochran v. GarthTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hesseltine v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Spaulding v. LackeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neamand EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Marler v. ClaunchTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Third National Bank in Nashville v. CottenTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Wolfe v. Mid-Continent Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Union Commerce Bank v. RothOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API