Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 1993No. 92-553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

The state has filed a motion seeking rehearing or clarification of the opinion filed in this cause on October 12, 1992. Appellant has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking us to enforce the mandate which appellant assumes was issued October 12, 1992.1 We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the state’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion of October 12, 1992, and substitute the following.

Appellant, Kenneth Murphy, appeals his sentences as an habitual felony offender.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. London v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API