Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Strasser

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1970No. 213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The Wisconsin statute authorizes and limits the questioning of witnesses as to prior criminal convictions in these words:

“A person who hag been convicted of a criminal offense is, notwithstanding, a competent witness, but the conviction may be proved to affect his credibility, either by the record or by his own cross-examination, upon which he must answer any question relevant to that inquiry, and the party cross-examining him is not concluded by his answer.”

This statutory provision applies to civil actions, as well as to criminal cases. No distinction between the two categories of cases is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Liphford v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nicholas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Moore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Scott v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McKissick v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API