Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Clannon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1839PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT 03? THE PTRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, JUDGE BUCHANAN PRESIDING. This is an action against the maker and endorser of a promissory note. On making judgment by default final, it Was confirmed against the maker alone. He appealed, and assigned various grounds as error apparent on the face of the record and proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The defendant and appellant assigns the following as errors apparent on the face of the record:

1. It does not appear that three judicial days elapsed between the judgment by default, and the final judgment.

2. The judgment by default does not express the grounds upon which it was rendered.

3. The judgment is not countersigned by the clerk of the court, nor does it appear that it was ever recorded in the record book, required by law Ho be kept for that purpose.

4. It appears that the judge signed the final judgment on the same day on which it was rendered, contrary to law.

5. It does not appear…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ascension Builders, Inc. v. JumonvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Succession of Rock v. Allstate Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Massey v. Consumer's Ice Co. of Shreveport, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Baker Finance Co. v. HinesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. Perrodin v. SOUTHERN SIDING CO. INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API