Ragsdale v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentShulman, Presiding Judge
“Theft by taking is only one crime, and the punishment for that crime is controlled by the value of the property taken. [Cit.] Where *451the state presents evidence that the stolen property was of some value but fails to show that the value was more than [$200], a conviction for theft by taking authorizes sentencing for a misdemeanor but not for a felony. [Cit.]” Williams v. State, 151 Ga. App. 266 (1) (259 SE2d 671). See also Pate v. State, 158 Ga. App. 395 (2) (280 SE2d 414). Because I believe that value was not sufficiently proven by competent evidence to have been in excess of $200, I must…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Choice v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Yarber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Wilson v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.