Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Reynolds

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1939No. 8944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fox, President:

F. M. Reynolds, by his will duly probated, devised specific parcels of real estate to each of his two sons, his daughter, and to the widow of a deceased son. He then named the executors of his will and empowered them to dispose of his personal estate, and to sell and convey all of his real estate, including that specifically devised, for the purpose of providing a fund for the payment of his debts. He evidently anticipated a surplus in his estate after the payment of the debts, as he devised and bequeathed the residue thereof to the four persons to whom he made specific…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arbenz v. ArbenzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  2. Berry v. Union National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ball v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McConaha v. RustWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ball v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API