Legal Opinion

Case v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by George F. Case against tbe city of Detroit to recover taxes paid under protest. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff was owner of premises in Detroit, upon which there were buildings. The board of assessors placed them upon the assessment roll for the year 1898 at a valuation of $92,900. It is admitted that, of this, $50,000 was the value of the buildings, and $42,900 that of the land. The roll was approved by the board of review, and subsequently, on June 9, 1898, the buildings were destroyed by fire. On July 12th, the plaintiff petitioned the common council to remit a portion of the taxes, corresponding to the amount assessed upon the buildings, and it adopted a resolution to remit and pay…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Holland Hitch Co. v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API