Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Thurman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1984No. Civ. 4020Published

1Opinion

In brief in support of his application for rehearing, appellant urges the reconsideration of that part of our decision finding there was no error for the trial court to inspect the premises or to elicit testimony from witnesses during the inspection.

Appellant argues that this court erred in allowing the inspection for two reasons: (1) that the viewing should have been conducted during the trial of the case and not as part of the pretrial procedure, and (2) that no testimony should have been taken at the viewing. He relies on the following quote from C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yeary v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Poteete v. City of Water ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kilgore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Meyer v. ShortSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API