Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Di Salvo Appliance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1960No. Civ. 18749PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants on a jury verdict in a personal injury action. It is urged by plaintiffs that the trial court committed prejudicial error in allowing a witness on redirect examination to read into evidence his prior consistent statement contained in a traffic accident report.

The facts disclose that on May 23, 1956, plaintiff † was operating his motorcycle in an easterly direction on Moorpark Avenue near its intersection with South Monroe Street in the city of San Jose, California. At the same time, defendants’ pickup truck…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Dam v. Lake Aliso Riding SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Buchanan v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Davies v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Box v. California Date Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API