Legal Opinion

Henry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2014No. 4D12-1502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerber, J.

The defendant, who used a worthless check to buy music recording equipment from the seller, argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment *1035of acquittal on the charges of grand theft of property valued at $100,000 or more and obtaining property in return for a worthless check. On the grand theft charge, the defendant argues the state: (1) failed to prove that he obtained the seller’s equipment with an intent to either permanently or temporarily deprive the seller of the equipment; and (2) failed to rebut his reasonable hypothesis of innocence that his failure to fully pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Segal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Iglesias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Izquierdo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Douglas S. Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Douglas S. Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Douglas S. Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. JASON MATTHEW SANDERS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API