Legal Opinion
City of Mobile v. Howard
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 15, 2010No. 1090941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
The City of Mobile (“the City”) appeals from an order requiring it to produce documents in response to a preaction-discov-ery request filed by Regenia T. Howard. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
In August 2009, Howard filed a verified petition in the Mobile Circuit Court, pursuant to Rules 27 and 34, Ala. R. Civ. P., requesting preaction discovery from the City related to an incident in which, in an attempt to apprehend Howard’s then 13-year-old son, T.T., who had left school without authorization, an officer employed by the Mobile Police Department shocked T.T.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Frost v. DangerfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Mental Health and Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- McConico v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D.R. Horton, Inc.—Birmingham v. FerrariSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015