Legal Opinion

Evans, Portnoy & Quinn v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Evans, Portnoy & Quinn (employer) petition for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirmed a referee’s decision finding Lori A. Retort (claimant) eligible for benefits. We reverse.

The relevant facts as found by the referee and adopted by the board1 are as follows:

1. For purposes of this appeal, the claimant was last employed as a part-time law clerk by Evans, Portney [sic], & Quinn, Attorneys-at-Law, at a final hourly rate of $8.50 and her last day of work was April 30, 1992.

2. The claimant, at the time of hire, was a second year law…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Chamoun v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Wiley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Charles v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graham v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Gibson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Garza v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Arbster v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Earnest v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API