Evans, Portnoy & Quinn v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
Evans, Portnoy & Quinn (employer) petition for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirmed a referee’s decision finding Lori A. Retort (claimant) eligible for benefits. We reverse.
The relevant facts as found by the referee and adopted by the board1 are as follows:
1. For purposes of this appeal, the claimant was last employed as a part-time law clerk by Evans, Portney [sic], & Quinn, Attorneys-at-Law, at a final hourly rate of $8.50 and her last day of work was April 30, 1992.
2. The claimant, at the time of hire, was a second year law…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hercules, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Chamoun v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wiley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Charles v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Graham v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Gibson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Garza v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Arbster v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Earnest v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.