In Re Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
By failing to answer the verified complaint for disciplinary action filed against him, the respondent, Alan Roy Miller, effectively has admitted to two counts of client neglect. Because of his neglect, we find that he should be suspended from the practice of law.
The Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint for disciplinary action against the respondent on July 9, 2001, and served a summons and complaint upon the respondent at his addresses as reflected in the Roll of Attorneys. Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28(14), as amended effective January 1,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Matter of JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of CushingIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
4Cited by2 opinions
- In Re WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- In re NeebIndiana Supreme Court · 2004