Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2001No. 22S00-0107-DI-319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

By failing to answer the verified complaint for disciplinary action filed against him, the respondent, Alan Roy Miller, effectively has admitted to two counts of client neglect. Because of his neglect, we find that he should be suspended from the practice of law.

The Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint for disciplinary action against the respondent on July 9, 2001, and served a summons and complaint upon the respondent at his addresses as reflected in the Roll of Attorneys. Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28(14), as amended effective January 1,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In the Matter of JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of CushingIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re NeebIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API