Legal Opinion

Ford v. Estate of Clinton

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2003No. S-01-1082PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

I. NATURE OF CASE

David L. Ford, the plaintiff, was working on a broken water main when he was hit by a truck driven by the defendant’s decedent, Mark B. Clinton. The primary issue in this appeal is the admissibility of accident reconstruction photographs taken by Randy Westfall, who testified for the defense as an accident reconstruction expert.

II. BACKGROUND

1. Factual and Procedural

Ford, an employee of the city of Kimball, Nebraska, was struck by Clinton’s truck and injured while working on a water main at approximately 4 a.m. on August 7, 1997. Ford and his coworkers were working to repair…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kudlacek v. Fiat S.P.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Aldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Boyd v. LynchMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Brown v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. BALIAN v. General MotorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GutierrezNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Trust of RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Mathews v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Epp v. LaubyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API