Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Malcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1925No. 4545PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. One ground of the motion for new trial alleges that the judge erred in charging the jury: “The written instrument executed by the deceased, B. 0. Langford, is not a will but is a deed, and a deed is "¿.contract. The law ordinarily requires more strength of mind, more *56intellect, to make a contract than to make a will. A man may be unable to transact business or lack the mental capacity to contract, and still have sufficient capacity to make a will.” This part of the charge was alleged in the motion for new trial to be erroneous, because “it unduly emphasized the amount of mental capacity to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Penn v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Edenfield v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Holland v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Brown v. Mayor of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Galloway v. HoggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Durrett v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API