Legal Opinion
Smith v. Walsh
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1993No. CIV-92-1521-APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two Motions For Summary Judgment, one from defendants, John Walsh, Sheriff Of Cleveland County (“the Sheriff’), Cliff Winkler (“Wink-ler”), Kevin Austin (“Austin”) and The Board Of County Commissioners Of Cleveland County, Oklahoma (“the County”) and the other from defendants, Michael J. Followwill (“Followwill”) and John’s Trucking, Inc. (“John’s Trucking”). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 66. Plaintiff Howard Ray Smith (“Smith”) has responded in opposition to both motions. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motions For Summary…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brinkman v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Andrew Gold v. James Poccia, Benjamin Sedam, David Nelson, Randy Polion, and The Town of Coventry, through its Finance Director, Robert ThibeaultDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
- Maisel v. AEH Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021