Legal Opinion

Clark v. Flinn & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtHasbrouck, J.

There is no doubt that negotiations were carried on by Daniel F. Flinn to sell the property and assets of Flinn & Co., Inc. There is no denial in his affidavit of the fact stated to the plaintiff by Flinn and his brother Maurice that “ Daniel F. Flinn owned practically all of the stock of the defendant corporation.”

Respondent gave as a reason for the denial of the motion that Flinn & Co. could not make such contract without the consent of the stockholders, and further that the bringing in of Flinn as a party to the trial would result in confusing the jury as to which was Hable.

The latter is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jamison v. LambornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Pope v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. McCorry v. John C. Wiarda & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API