Quigley v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The case is before us pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001), which requires a party challenging an interlocutory ruling of the trial court to "set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means." S.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2). Quigley has not met his burden under the rule. "The denial of a motion to dismiss in a criminal case is not appealable until after trial, and we have indicated many times that G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be used to circumvent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neverson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Jackson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Calzado v. Com.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dean Tran v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025