Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 16, 2018No. SJC-12543PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The case is before us pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001), which requires a party challenging an interlocutory ruling of the trial court to "set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means." S.J.C. Rule 2:21 (2). Quigley has not met his burden under the rule. "The denial of a motion to dismiss in a criminal case is not appealable until after trial, and we have indicated many times that G. L. c. 211, § 3, may not be used to circumvent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neverson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Jackson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Calzado v. Com.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dean Tran v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API