Mathews v. Mathews

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. The testimony on the motion for continuance because the clerk of the court allegedly refused to provide the contemnor with blank subpoenas being in conflict on this issue, the clerk testifying that he did not deny the contemnor the right to obtain subpoenas, the court did not err in denying the motion. This specification of error is without merit.

2. The colloquy or questions in regard to certain persons being called Communists had no bearing on the issue in this case, and the court properly ruled it not relevant on request of counsel; hence no harmful error has…