Legal Opinion
United States v. Kemmel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 3, 1961No. 13543PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We have carefully examined the record and have considered the arguments of appellant’s counsel. We can find no substantial prejudicial error in the proceeding. Consequently the judgment of conviction will be affirmed, D.C., 188 F.Supp. 736.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. KemmelDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Alcide W. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1983