Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. Ramos
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 31, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this holdover summary proceeding, landlord made substituted service upon tenant pursuant to RPAPL 735 (1), but failed to file the notice of petition, petition and proof of service in court within the period mandated by RPAPL 735 (2) where substituted service is made.
We hold that landlord was properly permitted to file proof of service in accordance with RPAPL 735 (2) nunc pro tunc (see generally Jamal Estates v Crockwell, 113 Misc 2d 548 [App Term, 1st Dept 1982]; Revelstoke Props. v Beaumont…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berkeley Associates Co. v. Di NolfiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Revelstoke Properties, Inc. v. Beaumont Neckwear, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Jamal Estates v. CrockwellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Redzep Djokic v. PerezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2008
- Matter of AMH Resources Corp v. FrenchNew York County Court, Warren County · 2025