Burse v. Alexander Trucking

Although I would analyze and interpret the facts differently, I concur in the majority’s decision that the plaintiff is entitled to worker’s compensation. However, I disagree with the decision concerning when the compensation should begin and with the award of penalties and attorney’s fees.

MEDICAL EVIDENCE

On November 6, 1985, plaintiff was facially injured when a truck tire exploded during the course and scope of his employment with defendant Alexander Trucking. He was taken to Charity Hospital, where he stayed for two days, until November 8. The only treatment he received was de-bridement of…