Legal Opinion

W.J. v. A.S.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2014No. WD 76303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

A.S.M. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgments finding that, pursuant to section 211.183.7,1 the Children’s Division is not required to make reasonable efforts to reunify S.C., W.J., and C.M. with Mother. Mother argues that the trial court’s finding that Mother subjected S.C., W.J., and C.M. to a severe act or recurrent acts of physical, emotion*826al, or sexual abuse was not supported by substantial evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural History2

Mother married C.S.M. (“Stepfather”) in 2004. Mother is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County v. M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In the Interest of W.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In the Interest of N.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Juvenile Officer v. F.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of: O.J.B., Juvenile Officer v. E.B. and T.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. In the Interest of: P.D.E. v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API