Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Duffy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 17, 2017No. 16–P–1241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial without an evidentiary hearing.2 "A decision whether to allow a new trial 'is addressed to the sound discretion of the [motion] judge.' " Commonwealth v. Cadet, 473 Mass. 173, 179 (2015), quoting from Commonwealth v. Perkins, 450 Mass. 834, 845 (2008). For the reasons articulated by the motion judge in his well-reasoned and detailed decision, we affirm.

The pro se defendant raises numerous arguments that can be organized into four groups. First, he argues three errors in the conduct of the trial: (1) supposed error in allowing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. HelfantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. OwensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. AvilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duffy v. GoguenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Duffy v. GoguenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API