Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided January 19, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Contempt for violating injunction. For former reports see 16 Fed. Rep. 25, and 18 Fed. Rep. 753.

1Opinion of the Court

Hawley, J.,

(orally.') On the 23d of January, A. D. 1881, a decree was entered in this court in favor of complainant, Woodruff, enjoining the defendants, the North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Company and others, “from discharging'or dumping into the Yuba river, or into any of its forks or branches, including Humbug creek, any of the tailings, boulders, cobble-stones, gravel, sand, clay, debris, or refuse matter from any of the tracts of mineral lands or mines described in the complaint.”

It is claimed that said corporation and L. L. Robinson, its president, on the 24th and 29th of February, 1888,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  2. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
  3. City of Carthage v. Empire Electric Power & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API