Cary v. National Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 251 N.W. 123. Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was on the ground that the facts stated in the complaint did not constitute a cause of action in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant. The trial court certified that the question presented was, in its opinion, important and doubtful. For the purposes of this case the factual allegations in the complaint are to be considered as true; a rather full statement thereof is necessary.
Appellant issued its bond to the First National Bank of Rush City, Minnesota, agreeing to make good any loss…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Pearson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reserve Ins. Co. v. General Ins. Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- State Bank of New Prague v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Wabash Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- Food Market Merchandising, Inc v. Scottsdale Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.