Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials after he was advised of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]). A court generally must look to the totality of the circumstances to determine the voluntariness of an inculpatory statement (see People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38 [1977]; People v Gega, 74 AD3d 1229, 1230-1231 [2010]). “The factors to be examined in determining the totality of the circumstances surrounding a defendant’s confession…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. GlinsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. GegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API