Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. District Court in & for the Second Judicial District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 9, 1991No. 91SA44PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
The petitioner, Frances Hernandez (Hernandez), seeks a writ of mandamus pursuant to C.A.R. 21. Hernandez contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her request for a child custody evaluation and her request that the fee for the evaluation be waived or be assessed against the intervenor, Rudy Cortez (Cortez). We issued a rule to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted. We now make the rule absolute.
I
Hernandez and Cortez entered into a common law marriage in 1987. One child, Rudy Cortez III, was born to this marriage on July 27,1987. When the couple…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Colorado Division of Employment & Training, Department of Labor & Employment v. Parkview Episcopal HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Binkley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Gonzales v. City of Castle RockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Allison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.