Legal Opinion

Herbert E. Saier v. State Bar of Michigan and the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1961No. 14462_1PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ CECIL, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff-appellant for the reason that it did not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Herbert E. Saier, plaintiff-appellant appeals to this Court, seeking a reversal of the order of dismissal.

The defendants in the District Court and appellees here are State Bar of Michigan, several officers and former officers of the State Bar of Michigan, who are sued in their official capacity and individually, and the justices and former…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. In Re CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Gary Harkins v. Gary Eldredge and the Missouri Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Leonard Ray Blanton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Matter of Seymour A. Gopman. United States of America v. Seymour A. GopmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API