Legal Opinion

Damm v. Damm

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1928No. 6,286PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Goldie E. Damm commenced divorce proceedings against her husband, John Damm, Jr., in the fall of 1926, on the grounds of desertion and nonsupport; she asked for alimony, temporary and permanent, attorney’s fees and suit money, and for the custody of their minor child, George, then five years of age. Defendant, by answer and cross-complaint, denied the allegations of the complaint filed and charged plaintiff with desertion; he prayed for a decree of divorce and for the custody of the child, alleging that plaintiff was not a lit person to care for the boy.

Issue being joined, a trial was had,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Roby v. RobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kane v. KaneMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Boles v. BolesMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hagle v. HagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Maudlin v. MaudlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Olson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Grush v. GrushMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. McDonald v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API