Phillips v. Pullen
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why an injunction shall not issue to restrain the defendant from taking proceedings to enforce a judgment at law.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The judgment in question was recovered in a suit upon an agreement by the complainant to pay $7,500 in settlement of an action which had been commenced against him by the defendant, for damages for debauching the defendant’s wife, enticing her away, and harboring her.
*6Upon a writ of error to Mercer circuit court, where the cause in which the judgment was recovered was tried, the court of errors and appeals affirmed the judgment of the court below and thereby confirmed the decision of many of the questions sought to be again raised by the bill in this case. That decision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Hendrickson v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Osgood v. FranklinNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
- Simpson v. HartNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- In re the Estate of AtkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pascarella v. BruckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Falcon B. L. Assn. v. SchwartzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936