Gardner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Elizabeth and Fredric Gardner assert, in a nutshell, that Bethel Aram Ministries (BAM) is a church, that Elizabeth is its corporation sole, and that both Elizabeth and Fredric have taken vows of poverty (with their maintenance provided by BAM). They argue that based on these facts they did not earn taxable income and are exempt from paying taxes.
The Tax Court, however, determined that the payments received by the Gard- ners were not contributions to BAM and that the Gardners had complete control over BAM’s assets. It concluded that because the Gardners…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hernandez v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gardner v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- James A. Lloyd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020
- Roe DC 57 v. DOE 1, a corporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Society of Apostolic Church Ministries v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Society of Apostolic Church Ministries v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.