Legal Opinion

Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 1, 2000No. Docket Nos. 98-4033, 98-4214 and 98-4246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:

The consolidated cases before the Court require us to interpret the effect of the permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546 (1996), on the jurisdiction of federal courts to hear challenges raised by criminal aliens with respect to removal proceedings commenced by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). In three opinions handed down in the last three years, we considered the effect of various provisions of the Antiter-rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deboris Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Sergio Madrid v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Fazila Khan v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. In re LeClaireVermont Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API