State v. Lomax
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} The right to trial by jury is fundamental to Anglo-American jurisprudence — -it cannot be lightly surrendered. We hold that the defendant in a felony case, in addition to signing the required written waiver, must orally acknowledge that he understands that he is waiving his right to a jury trial.
{¶ 2} After a bench trial, defendant-appellant, Keith Lomax, was convicted of murder. Because Lomax’s waiver of a trial by jury was not made in open court, his jury waiver did not comply with the requirements of R.C. 2945.05. Therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LomaxOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Obsaint, C-060629 (6-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007