Bramblett v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 20 — ACTION ON NOTE The assignee Caldwell even .if the assignment of the note to him be conceded, had no right to fill up the blank assignment after the maturity of the note. Geni.
Read the full summary
Case 20 — ACTION ON NOTE The assignee Caldwell even .if the assignment of the note to him be conceded, had no right to fill up the blank assignment after the maturity of the note. Geni. Stat., Sec. 13, chap. 22; Allin, Exr., &c. v. Shadburn’s Heirs, 1 Dana, 68; Morrison v. Stockwell’s Admr., 9 Dana, 172; Muhling v. Sattler, &c., 3 Met., 285; Pace v. Welmending, &c., 12 Bush, 141. . This action is on a promissory note, payable to the maker’s order and endorsed by him, and delivered to the Deposit Bank of Carlisle, Kentucky, and the blank above the name on the back of said note filled up with…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HAZELRIGG
delivered the opinion of tiie court.
This action was brought by appellee against appellant on the following writing: “$150. Carlisle, Ky., June 1, 1893. Nine months after date, we promise to pay W. L. Bramblett or order? one hundred and fifty dollars, for' value received. Negotiable and payable at the Deposit Bank of Carlisle, Ky., with interest at the rate of eight per cent,” etc. “[Signed.] Charles Robinson. W. L. Bramblett.” On the back of the note, when the suit was brought, appeared this indorsement: “I promise to pay within note to the Deposit Bank of Carlisle, Ky., W. L.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Meyer v. Chas. Rosenheim & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Tidwell v. O'Bryan's Adm'r.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944