Legal Opinion

Moore, Jenkins & Co. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Garnishment. Bond. Evidence. Before Judge James Johnson. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

Defendant in attachment, in order to dissolve garnishment, gave bond with security, the bond being conditioned to pay the eventual condemnation money, so far as the effects and moneys garnished shall be found liable to the plaintiffs’ demand. After recovering on the attachment, the plaintiff moved the court to enter up judgment on the bond against principal and security. The court held that the bond did not conform to the statute, and denied the motion. This decision was not excepted to, and was never reversed. The plaintiffs *68then brought an action of debt upon the bond…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald Military Band v. Colony BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Spain v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API